By: Bill Hunter
In reply to Willard. Gordon Robertson says: ”billyou and I know wee willy lacks the intellect to argue on the basis of science, so he resort to pettiness. Hes not even good at that, however, since he...
View ArticleBy: Bill Hunter
In reply to Bill Hunter. Obviously Willard can’t read the explanations in Roy’s graphic.
View ArticleBy: Willard
In reply to Willard. [ME] The fact that I understood does not make it more legitimate, Frankie dear. Youre stuck with a complex Y-axis, and thats that. Oh, and you forgot to say how that point is...
View ArticleBy: Willard
In reply to Swenson. Mike Flynn, Thank you for playing dumb. What has been done is a bit like in one of your old comments: Mike Flynn says: September 13, 2019 at 7:53 PM [Puffman], Spot on. [Mike...
View ArticleBy: Tim S
In reply to Antonin Qwerty. I was making a sarcastic comment to suggest irony. Let me be clear. Dr Spencer is schooling Gavin in data analysis, and that is ironic. It gets back to the question of who...
View ArticleBy: Swenson
In reply to Swenson. Witless Wee Willy, You wrote “Cmon, Bordo. Thats not what has been done.” Aw, cmon Willy, dont keep us in suspense tell us what has been done. If you can actually figure out what...
View ArticleBy: Nate
In reply to Tim S. How do you determine the same point? In UAH the T can swing wildly from month to month. Start on a high month for UAH, then it will end up dipping below whatever series is being...
View ArticleBy: Gordon Robertson
In reply to Swenson. I don’t think there is an official degree in climate science. It’s usually under the umbrella of atmospheric physics. I agree with your assessment. Even geologists like Michael...
View Article
